Disclaimer

The information and links on this page are provided for informational purposes as a source of discussion and the thoughts and viewpoints expressed in these articles are products of the authors and do not reflect that of SWGTREAD. If there is other pertinent information that should be included on this site, please This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. for inclusion.

Introduction

Shoe print evidence is often encountered at crime scenes and has been widely accepted in the forensic community. Conclusions from the examination of shoe print evidence may include elimination, class association or a positive identification based on the presence of individual characteristics, with the conclusion most often reached being class association. Forensic scientists, detectives and attorneys are challenged as to the significance of a class association of shoe print evidence. The goal of this study is to determine the likelihood of two people having a shoe similar in tread design, size and wear to establish the significance of class associations of shoe print evidence for both partial shoe prints (toe only) and complete shoe prints (toe and heel).

Conclusion

Overall, the complete shoe print (toe and heel) had a greater degree of discrimination than the partial prints (toe). After all comparisons were performed it was determined that out of 1607 shoe prints (1,290,421 possible pairs), no two shoe prints were the same in tread design, size and wear, ultimately proving the significance of class associations of shoe print evidence.